Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

KristnSchaalisahorse t1_j69msj5 wrote

From the article (which was published yesterday):

>Reams of data needed to be analyzed by NASA’s teams to make sure that Artemis I didn’t succeed in spite of serious problems. Fortunately that does not seem to be the case: Although the teams are still working through the terabytes of raw data, the agency has pronounced the mission good enough to endorse its sequel.

31

Radiant_Nothing_9940 t1_j69q09e wrote

Ok fair enough. Still think it’s pretty clickbaity though.

−7

Meior t1_j6aza97 wrote

Not sure how not calling the results before you have the actual data is clickbait. I'd say that's unusually responsible journalism.

9

Radiant_Nothing_9940 t1_j6c6if4 wrote

I mean the Reddit repost and title. It doesn’t tell anyone that that’s what the article’s about.

−2