kdiuro13 OP t1_j121owq wrote
Reply to comment by 8andahalfby11 in ESA's Vega-C launcher has suffered a failure in its first commercial flight by kdiuro13
Yep confirmed here. Underpressure in the 2nd stage. Either a failure to ignite or an underperform. Either way a launch failure. Apogee was 110km and vehicle impacted Atlantic Ocean shortly after.
toodroot t1_j125b34 wrote
The ground camera says it lit. Remember 2 failures ago, when it burned through the top of the 2nd stage? This is a different stage (wider). But still.
cjameshuff t1_j12f45p wrote
It looked like it lit, burned a while, then something happened that caused the plume to become much wider and more diffuse, and the stage was either gyrating or tumbling. Maybe a major failure of the nozzle?
Barrrrrrnd t1_j12mtuo wrote
That’s what I was thinking. Either they burned through it or the back fell off. Either way they lost command authority and thrust.
citoloco t1_j12x6ya wrote
What about the front?
TADthePaperMaker t1_j16ei2f wrote
Well it’s not supposed to fall off, I can tell you that right now.
cjameshuff t1_j15y1jx wrote
It seems like the third stage separated and ignited normally, and that's attached to the front. Maybe it broke away before that though, the CGI was obviously not an accurate depiction of what was going on.
[deleted] t1_j15g22w wrote
[removed]
jgf556 t1_j14545c wrote
Might have been the plume going over the first stage.
cjameshuff t1_j14qd99 wrote
It happened about a minute into the second stage burn, and lasted for the remainder of the burn. https://youtu.be/CokbWoYm9w4?t=1103
jgf556 t1_j14ri6f wrote
Ah ok, didn't pick that up
TbonerT t1_j151tje wrote
Probably something like that. You can see the speed start to drop right then, too.
electromagneticpost t1_j12z6i7 wrote
At least they made it to space, although I don't think the satellites were supposed to end up at the bottom of the ocean.
toodroot t1_j130no0 wrote
This is a good example of why most people think "space" means "orbit".
electromagneticpost t1_j130wgn wrote
The Karmen Line, which is what I was going off of, is arbitrary with some aerodynamic calculations to back it up, it’s much easier to to define what an orbit is rather than where space begins.
[deleted] t1_j131313 wrote
[deleted]
electromagneticpost t1_j1316xe wrote
That’s what I’m saying, aside from tourism, testing, and short experiments, suborbital flights aren’t really that useful.
[deleted] t1_j131b2m wrote
[deleted]
electromagneticpost t1_j131dlv wrote
I was just adding on to my previous comment.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments