Submitted by Buzzthejoker t3_zqcexr in space
Comments
scubawankenobi t1_j0xm2zo wrote
This makes me more sad than it probably should.
RIP you great little lander!
pavels_ceti_eel t1_j0xnvdp wrote
Might be, but its out lasted any reasonable prediction and i have only this to say ... good lander. Whos a good good little probe thats right you are
_Puppet_Mastr_ t1_j0y10fc wrote
Served it's duty well beyond expectations, now will stand a monument to mankind's first babysteps into the solar system, for a long long time. Maybe a tourist stop one day..
strangemanornot t1_j10hfpc wrote
For sure, although the remains will probably deteriorate by then
JackHydrazine t1_j10it6y wrote
Maybe one day in the future NASA will develop technology to clean the dust off of those solar panels.
codewolf t1_j10yiy0 wrote
I was wondering the same thing - but thinking something along the lines of an air blower.
Candid-Grape7189 t1_j119xv9 wrote
More expensive. More things to fail. Would also cause damage by scratching up the panels. That would significantly lower the amount of light it gets far sooner than dust collection. And people forget... Our landers/rovers and probes are friggin huge. Would need the equivalent of a push broom alongside all the mechanical stuff needed for that purpose alone.
istubbedallmytoes t1_j11a07m wrote
It's not just dry thin dust. After 4 years, it becomes grimy and baked in. Picture a windshield in a snowy area. How the grime gets too thick for dry wiping and you have to use wiper fluid.
garry4321 t1_j11adql wrote
Yes exactly! My only thought about the blower is that it would only work on planets where the atmosphere is dense enough.
garry4321 t1_j11cn9f wrote
If they brushed it wouldn’t grime up though
codewolf t1_j11g7gb wrote
Or how about a clear film covering that has layers or a roller of film that can be removed / replaced to take off the grime? Something like in this link but automated.
codewolf t1_j11gdpd wrote
I think if you could double (or significantly extend) the life of the rover, a solution would be cost beneficial.
istubbedallmytoes t1_j11ho50 wrote
Well if the top minds in a reddit comment thread are on it....
tpproberts t1_j145pef wrote
The Insight project has requirements: baseline and threshold science. If those requirements are met the project has to justify an extended mission operations plan. Sometimes the extra data doesn’t add to the science. Those who claim “cleaning the solar arrays” is a missed opportunity are mistaken. The data has been collected and the teams of operations engineers are needed elsewhere.
JackHydrazine t1_j14no2l wrote
In this case the data gathered so far in regards to the geology of Mars definitely justifies an extended mission and a budget to support it.
Another example would be the Voyager 1 and 2 probes that were launched in the late 1970s. It has provided us some great data about heliosphere and its boundary layer as well as the conditions of interstellar space.
[deleted] t1_j0xfphr wrote
[removed]