[deleted] OP t1_j1dlpk2 wrote
[deleted]
ynghuncho t1_j1dmcru wrote
The Galactic Empire or United Nations Space Command, duh
[deleted] OP t1_j1do2yv wrote
[removed]
Powerful-Space-2142 t1_j1dm1kv wrote
Sending probes and stuff is fine because they are not causing any permanent change, but here in they are basically causing a permanent change in the space. Doesnt that mean that it should be regulated by some body.
Accomplished-Home471 t1_j1dmife wrote
Permanent change of what? Of an asteroid circling 7 million miles away from earth? It had no effect on us, it was a test.
Powerful-Space-2142 t1_j1dmsse wrote
I agree but lets say tomorrow they want to run a similar test on an asteroid in the asteroid belt. It can affect the Earth, doesnt that necessitate that NASA or any space body at least gets a consensus from different space agencies
keuschonter t1_j1dna00 wrote
General treaties on space say "no weapons" there is literally not a regulatory body that covers space, it does not exist. NASA does not need to get permission from anyone but the FAA so that they don't accidentally send a rocket into a plane. I'm almost certain they tell other countries they're sending something up so that nobody thinks we're launching nukes at them, but there's no need to seek permission because there's literally no one to get permission from.
[deleted] OP t1_j1dn6d1 wrote
[deleted]
TareaMizou t1_j1dpqcg wrote
The asteroid belt is much farther away than the DART target. They targeted a near earth asteroid and the purpose of this test was to protect the earth from potentially hazardous asteroids. Any such consensus would be nice to have but not at all required under any current treaty. Plus who is going to try to stop the US from sending interplanetary probes
[deleted] OP t1_j1donbl wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments