I realize that my comments were a bit aggressive toward you, personally. Sorry for that. I get a bit tired of reading all of the pro-SpaceX propaganda when a lot of folks outside the industry don't realize how much help Elon has received from NASA and indirectly from all of the companies that they disparage. When NASA contracts ULA, Boeing, Lockheed, etc. they end up sharing all of that knowledge with other competitors for future contracts. Combine that with an aggressive risk posture for cargo missions and you get companies advancing quickly (SpaceX, Blue Origin). Human Spaceflight takes time, hence the delays to the mission. We can't fly crew on Artemis-I because SLS is unproven. Artemis-I was delayed because of SLS delays. I think a lot of the mission gets discredited for the fault of one company and all of the other companies supporting the launch take the flak. The idea behind the moon is that we need a lot of unproven technologies to get us to Mars. Living and having a base on the moon allows us to experience all of those problems and solve them while being relatively close to home. Similar to ISS. I wish we still had the budget that NASA once had, we would be so much farther along than we are now.

Regardless of whether you agree or not, I wish you happy holidays.