Submitted by TrunkMonkey1972 t3_z4t2bp in space
[removed]
Submitted by TrunkMonkey1972 t3_z4t2bp in space
[removed]
Be patient. The images and video we're seeing are throttled by the limited DSN downlink. NASA's recording higher resolution stuff that will be accessible after splashdown.
I thought one of the goals or gateway and Orion were to upgrade DSN bandwidth.
I'm just guessing here but I can imagine the desire to increase bandwidth doesn't change the fact that it's a limited resource and we're still just seeing dirty high priority stuff.
Where did you see people claim highest resolution photos? That's not the mission objective. Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter is getting better photos than Artemis ever will.
Imagine looking at one photo online and deciding that you could have done a Lunar recon mission better than NASA.
iPhones camera quality have given people high expectations. They do put all other cameras to shame though.
I think i saw a GoPro was used for the "selfie" shot of Orion. Read headline not article.
I'm sure it's in some mission statement somewhere, but I can imagine the data network is concentrated on the dummies and capsule data. They can get all the HD videos/photos after splashdown instead of wasting bandwidth on tertiary data.
They moon has almost no color, just grey tones with a few exceptions (it actually turns out that the moon is closer to black than to white. I have seen it compared to a charcoal briquette. The sun is so bright, though, that it looks white against the dark sky). We flew color cameras to the moon on GRAIL in 2012 and got the same complaint about black and white photos.
[deleted]
[removed]
[removed]
[deleted]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
Devil’s advocate here but I see OPs point. There’s higher res images from mars. There’s absolutely no argument for such low quality images in this day and age, save for the IR or navigation camera bit. Even still, I do not believe documenting this could have less precedence than a simple vehicle test. This is the Apollo 8 of Orion.
Source: I have a digital imaging degree and a degree in aerospace
If it were navigation caneras it wouldn't be taking hi res images of the moon surface. The goals of Artemis is to.put nan on the moon permanently. You need water for that. It's known in the polar craters in permanent shadow have water ice in them. This is why it's such high contras.
They look like infrared images. Probably looking for signs of water ice in the darkest parts of craters that never see the sun.
No, these are from the navigation camera. Basically doing the same thing as the star tracking cameras. High contrast is good and makes it easier for the computer to get it's bearings, but it doesn't make very pretty photos. There are other satellites looking for ice.
That's a photo captured by the Orion's optical navigation camera. Overexposure is needed to see the stars more clearly.
OP is complaining that cameras designed to track stars to calculate position/orientation/etc. is not good at capturing images of the surface of the Moon. So it must be some NASA conspiracy! lol
[removed]
[deleted]
LaunchTransient t1_ixsma4r wrote
These are images from Orion's navigation cameras. They're great for getting your bearings, but they're not the top tier surface imaging cameras such as those used on the LRO.
>I don't believe Nasa installed a camera with a fixed aperture, completely non-adjustable
If you want something for figuring out your vehicle's orientation and position in space, that's exactly what you want. Now, I agree that the cameras onboard aren't the best, but this is a technology demonstrator mission, not a "lets map the moon in 12K sharp quality" mission.