Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

quesarah t1_iy23wv6 wrote

Reply to comment by EphraimJenkins in NASA's Artemis 1 Orion spacecraft flies past record distance set by Apollo 13 by EricFromOuterSpace

Exactly. Otherwise I believe the record for "farthest human made object" is held by one of the Voyagers.

53

MaroonBookPro t1_iy2clg5 wrote

“Farthest human made object with chairs in it”

48

swftswft13 t1_iy2ecns wrote

Where is that space Tesla hanging out these days?

38

MaroonBookPro t1_iy2hm8l wrote

Ah true.

Ok then, farthest human-made object with chairs and a roof.

27

MasterMagneticMirror t1_iy2qcza wrote

Nope. The Apollo 10 Lunar Module ascent stage would still beat Artemis since it was put in solar orbit. As said by ESA, Artemis 1 is the farthest human rated spacecraft designed to bring back its crew to the Earth. So chair, roof and thermal protection system.

14

wedontlikespaces t1_iy2ynje wrote

That rather suggests that there is the record for the farthest rated human spacecraft that just let it's crew died when the mission was completed.

3

MaroonBookPro t1_iy3lu3g wrote

Pretty sure the Lunar Modules didn’t have chairs oddly enough.

3

Active-Device-8058 t1_iy2d5ih wrote

Tell me you didn't read the article without telling me you didn't read the article.

Edit: Downvote all you want. This is a record for furthest human-rated spacecraft. That's literally the first line in the link. Everyone talking about "HURR BUT Voyager is way further" is completely missing the point. Human-rated doesn't require a human on board. You don't have to like it, but it's true.

Edit 2: Go argue with Nasa if you don't like it. The record stands:
https://twitter.com/NASA/status/1595145300628635648

20

MasterMagneticMirror t1_iy2qjhl wrote

Human-rated and designed to bring back the crew to Earth. The farthest human-rated spacecraft period was the Apollo 10 ascent stage put in solar orbit.

13

craftworkbench t1_iy2pmkv wrote

Agreed. It'll be more momentous to break the record with humans aboard but it's still a great accomplishment to prove that a spacecraft designed for human flight can and has gone that far.

No need to put down the accomplishment, especially since it's clearly qualified in the article.

3

toodroot t1_iy2shi9 wrote

It isn't human-rated yet. This test has to be passed first.

This capsule lacks most of the life support system, btw.

Edit: It's surprising how many sub members appear to think you can human-rate a spacecraft without flying it! Remember the challenges Boeing is still having with getting Starliner human-rated?

−3

Active-Device-8058 t1_iy2svyq wrote

Lol okay I'll go let Nasa know. Thanks for your input:

https://twitter.com/NASA/status/1595145300628635648

LIVE NOW: On Sat, Nov. 26, /NASA_Orion will break the record for farthest distance of a human-rated spacecraft, previously held by Apollo 13. Join our /TwitterSpaces to reflect on /NASAHistory and look to the future of #Artemis. Use #AskNASA or raise your hand to ask questions.

4

bigloser42 t1_iy3gniw wrote

It’s either Voyager or the manhole cover from operation plumbob. The low end estimate for its speed is 66 km/sec(41miles/sec). If it survived exiting the atmosphere, which it probably didn’t, it would have a pretty good lead on Voyager.

3