Submitted by jeffsmith202 t3_y6ku1g in space
GrittyPrettySitty t1_isrk6gc wrote
Reply to comment by actual-rationalist in NASA outlines case for making sole-source SLS award to Boeing-Northrop joint venture by jeffsmith202
The market? You mean the companies who fail to meet deadlines?
nate-arizona909 t1_isuuqzj wrote
Boeing, Lockheed, Northrop, et. al. are so enmeshed with the federal government it’s almost impossible to see where the one ends and the other starts. They are at best quasi-government entities.
The big clue to this is you will almost never see a cost plus contract of these sorts in the private sector.
GrittyPrettySitty t1_it5k005 wrote
Good point. I agree. They are the biggest jobs program in the world.
SexualizedCucumber t1_iswo9du wrote
Government contractors aren't allowed enough risk of failure and because of this, they drag their feet at massive cost to the government.
For example: If Starliner and SLS fails, Boeing will be at 0 risk of going under. If Starlink and Starship fails, SpaceX will almost definitely go under. So it's no surprise which of those two moves more quickly.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments