Submitted by Apart_Shock t3_ya8bps in space
TrippedBreaker t1_itc7saj wrote
Reply to comment by TimeTravelingChris in NASA orders 3 more Orion crew capsules for Artemis moon missions by Apart_Shock
So there is nothing currently flying that could replace SLS. Until Falcon Heavy is man rated or Starship shows it can do the deed, SLS is the only game in town, assuming that it can fly.
AmishRocket t1_itc9krg wrote
“This spaceship can do everything but fly” is not a huge selling point.
TrippedBreaker t1_itcf381 wrote
I'm not trying to sell it. It is what it is. Currently nothing is man rated for the Moon. Even SLS. I'll take whoever can get there and call it good. SpaceX, Boeing or whoever. I'm agnostic as to who. I want to see us go back.
I don't see this as a zero sum game where to succeed SLS must fail.
[deleted] t1_itchn8d wrote
[removed]
Darwins_Dog t1_itcdgtj wrote
There's no game in town at all. SLS has yet to move under it's own power.
sumelar t1_itchi1w wrote
SLS is not in town yet.
Falcon Heavy could do the job tomorrow if it came down to it. SLS would get put on the pad, hydrogen would cause another leak, and it wouldn't go anywhere.
TrippedBreaker t1_itcl89z wrote
Well that's one way of looking at it. Like most races we'll see who crosses the finish line first.
TimeTravelingChris t1_itcu0cb wrote
Falcon Heavy flew and landed over 4 years ago. Nasa chose to save shuttle contractors.
TrippedBreaker t1_itcy172 wrote
Since Elon Musk decided to not man rate it the point is moot.
TimeTravelingChris t1_itd5ehh wrote
Why would he? Nasa didn't pursue it. Stop making excuses for SLS.
TimeTravelingChris t1_itcc2lh wrote
Do you work for the SLS contractors or something? Holy shit stop.
[deleted] t1_itcfmz2 wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments