Yumewomiteru t1_iuikvmi wrote
Cheers to China for a series of successful launches, when countries all over the world are having trouble sending up payloads. Can't wait for the scientific discoveries that the space station will provide!
[deleted] t1_iuimzis wrote
[removed]
Temstar t1_iuip9ep wrote
Tiangong is in fact set to host experiments from 17 countries, the results they generate will belong to both China as well as the origin nations.
Yumewomiteru t1_iuiq7r4 wrote
Only applies to the US who have explicitly banned any and all cooperation with the CNSA.
yahwol t1_iuj06k3 wrote
just like how the US doesn't share any data with China. Quid Pro No
[deleted] t1_iujevl7 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_iuj0xmx wrote
[deleted]
Yumewomiteru t1_iuj1gjy wrote
The US, India, Japan, and South Korea has had high profile launch failures this year and last, that includes SpaceX.
[deleted] t1_iuj3occ wrote
[deleted]
Yumewomiteru t1_iuj4f29 wrote
Loss of an entire payload of satellites.
Shrike99 t1_iujfy1b wrote
>Loss of an entire payload of satellites.
That was a payload failure, not a launch failure, since the rocket delivered the satellites to exactly where it was supposed to. And they didn't lose the entire payload - 11 of those satellites are currently in operational orbits.
Starlink payload failures also aren't exactly rare - SpaceX have lost 321 to date over 64 launches, or about 5 per launch on average. If you want to consider losing some satellites to be a launch failure, then SpaceX have had 37 launch failures over the course of the Starlink program.
This would give Falcon 9 Block 5 an overall launch success rate of only 72%, making it by far the least reliable operational launch vehicle with a statistically significant number of launches - an obviously absurd claim.
You can use the aforementioned Starlink numbers to argue that SpaceX aren't very good at building reliable satellites, but by the standards used in the industry they're very good at building reliable rockets - Falcon 9 has had no launch failures in the last 6 years and 158 launches.
seanflyon t1_iuje4cc wrote
The last SpaceX (non-test) failure was in 2016 when AMOS-6 was lost before launch during a static fire. Since they retired the Falcon 1 in 2009 they have lost 2 primary payloads and delivered 1 secondary payload to the wrong orbit. They have had zero failures or partial failures in the last 100+ launches.
Yumewomiteru t1_iujf3yw wrote
Loss of 40 satellites is a pretty big failure don't you think?
seanflyon t1_iujfhiz wrote
Nothing about a launch failure in that article. Did you read it?
Yumewomiteru t1_iujio1a wrote
Launching a payload into destruction is by definition a failure, this applies to your precious SpaceX too.
seanflyon t1_iujjyqu wrote
You are the one who brought up launch failures. There were zero problems with that launch. There were problems with a majority of the payloads after launch for reasons that had nothing to do with the launch itself.
Are you just trolling here?
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments