Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Naive-Gene-7583 OP t1_isxw3wv wrote

Reply to comment by SpartanJack17 in What Earth year would it be after 100 billion years from now in theory? by Naive-Gene-7583

Maybe I had to use the term ‘Earth cycle’ instead of theory. Instead of just adding numbers. For example we see CE ( Current Era ) etc.

1

SpartanJack17 t1_isxx9zk wrote

That's not any sort of cycle or anything. CE or common era is the modern way of saying AD, which stands for Anno Domini, which is Latin for the year of our Lord. The year zero used to be defined as the year Jesus was supposedly born, and CE is just a way to keep using this date system without tying it to a specific religion. We won't be adding new or different letters or anything.

1

Naive-Gene-7583 OP t1_isxxf6p wrote

That is the reason I said ‘example’

1

SpartanJack17 t1_isy0bqj wrote

But there isn't any sort of cycle or anything, that's the point. A year is just a number, every year it goes up by one. So in 100 billion years it'll be the current year plus 100 billion. There's nothing special going on with how time flows or anything.

1