Submitted by Free_Swimming t3_126v387 in space
Sea_Ask6095 t1_jee4q6n wrote
Reply to comment by HungryLikeTheWolf99 in Nokia to set up first 4G network on moon with NASA by Free_Swimming
Most likely well tested systems that have operated for years and bugs/flaws are more likely to have been found.
5G requires CPUs/hardware built from smaller circuits, usually 7nm. The smaller the logic gates the more senstive they are to radiation. 4G probably works better in a highly radioactive environment.
KarmaWSYD t1_jeelsb4 wrote
Even beyond 4G being much more reliable (and cheaper) 5G simply has a much lower range which'd either mean much less coverage or considerably more stations (i.e. launch weight and setup) for the same coverage.
mouse_puppy t1_jefegfb wrote
In part lower range because of atmosphere. I wonder how 80Ghz would do on the moon
KarmaWSYD t1_jefghvk wrote
Yeah, the atmosphere is definitely a factor in range but buildings and the like also serve to stop signals. I'd expect that to be a particular effect when any buildings likely need more shielding from radiation due to, well, being on the moon. Of course, there's a chance that they don't actually need that network capability inside buildings but if they do 4G would most likely be the better option.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments