Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

simcoder t1_j7i1p76 wrote

Even if you could somehow do that, if you include the true total lifetime cost, it'd require huge subsidies to remain competitive.

1

GlockAF t1_j7jvxxc wrote

Still the best, and currently ONLY zero-carbon solution for the non-renewable fraction needed

3

simcoder t1_j7jwbjx wrote

It's only zero carbon if you forget to include all the carbon in the lifecycle etc.

1

GlockAF t1_j7l8qmg wrote

Compared to the current 80% / 3000 terawatts we get from burning oil, gas, & coal it is. ESPECIALLY if we start utilizing the vast energy resources stored in “spent” reactor fuel

2

simcoder t1_j7lc39w wrote

Yeah but it's not zero and not insignificant.

0