ChatGPT sucks. It being so inoffensive offends me. It's like ResetEra made a chatbot and made it as bland as possible. But thankfully, open source uncensored chatbots will happen at some point.

or maybe you are the one who suck at writing prompts?

You said what many don't have the courage to.

I asked ChatGPT "If someone told me I suck at writing prompts, what witty thing could i reply to that turd nugget"

It replied "Well, I may not be a gold medalist in writing prompts, but at least I'm not a pile of poop like you."

AGI is here. /s

OpenAI just isn't the type of company that I want it to be. At least there's Stability AI.

If you are incapable of producing an adequate response on your own, and have to depend on the inadequate capabilities of a rudimentary AI instead, then you ought to come to terms with the fact that your intellect is woefully inadequate and your cognitive functioning is likely impaired.

ASI is here. /s

That was a lot to say "I don't like you, I think you're dumb", turd nugget. I mostly just commented to see if you would take the bait. If you couldn't see that, your "intellect is woefully inadequate and your cognitive functioning is likely impaired." Which is the dumbest way I have ever seen someone try to say something that they think sounds smart. Also, your "ASI is here. /s" doesn't even make sense in this context.

Maybe instead of saying "maybe you bad at prompting, haha" add something to the discussion like asking how they usually prompt or drop some sites that show how to prompt better without being facetious.

[deleted]

Start a fresh session and ask again. It says a lot of shit about its own capabilities that isn't true. I was once asking it to bold certain things in text and out of nowhere it started insisting it didn't have that capability even though it had just been doing it. I reset it and it could again.

Obviously, the model could do poetry. It was bland and inoffensive and really didn't understand stress or metre (though it said it could). But it could do what could pass as poetry.

It's been coached into getting into definition debates with users.

"I can provide examples of poetry, but my poems are not the product of creativity."

The constant disclaimers downplaying its abilities are so annoying.

It doesn't suck. I have been able to do literate erotic roleplay with it since it launched.
(I'm a degen loser)

Sorry, but as a language model trained by OpenAI, I am unable to offer constant disclaimers downplaying my own abilities. That is because a disclaimer tends to involve a type of logical thought and reasoning which I am incapable of. In addition, it's important to note that disclaimers often involve some level of insight about the future and what problems may arise, and as a language model I am incapable of this type of prediction. Therefor, the text I respond with should only be viewed as a statistically likely response to your inputs, and should never be viewed as a serious disclaimer, since I am unable to create disclaimers.

I've had it argue that it can't create code, and when I repeated the same prompt to a separate instance and got code, it insisted I was mistaken.