Submitted by blueSGL t3_10gg9d8 in singularity
Borrowedshorts t1_j55qvtl wrote
Reply to comment by SurroundSwimming3494 in I was wrong about metaculus, (and the AGI predicted date has dropped again, now at may 2027) by blueSGL
I don't think they are honestly. They may know some of the intracacies and difficulties of their specific problem and then project that it will be that difficult to make progress in other subdomains. Which is probably true, but they also tend to underestimate the efforts other groups are putting in and the progress that can happen in other subdomains, which isn't always linear. So imo, they aren't really qualified to give an accurate prediction because very few have actually even studied the problem. I'd trust the people who have actually studied the problem, these are AGI experts and tend to be much more optimistic than the AI field overall.
AsheyDS t1_j55s0h2 wrote
>AGI experts
No such thing yet since AGI doesn't exist. Even when it does, there are still going to be many more paths to AGI in my opinion, so it may be quite a while before anyone can be considered an expert in AGI. Even the term is new and lacks a solid definition.
SurroundSwimming3494 t1_j55sj7z wrote
Is studying AGI even a thing, though? AGI does not exist yet and could never do so (potentially), so I'm not sure how one can study something nonexistent. To have theories, sure, but that's another thing.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments