Submitted by duffmanhb t3_10b08uq in singularity
AwesomeDragon97 t1_j48vo5k wrote
Reply to comment by duffmanhb in Breakthrough milestone in understanding the reversal of aging by duffmanhb
I always thought that telomere shortening and tumour suppressing genes were the main causes of aging, has this been proven false?
duffmanhb OP t1_j48yn32 wrote
Telomeres were also just a theory, based off observations of older people who aged well, and other species. That long telomeres prevent the cell damages as they act like a sort of redundant absorption for mutations. However, much like the DNA damage theory, it had a lot of conflicting evidence that made direct correlation hard to prove... It's likely long telomeres are more likely a symptomatic correlation rather than causal.
Tumor suppression probably also exists within the epigenetic side of things as well. As we age, our bodies get worse and worse at fighting things off. They replicated this by artificially aging the mice which suddenly got more tumors. So as the epigenetics of the cells get more noisy, so does their ability to precisely work as intended, thus more tumors.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments