Submitted by arachnivore t3_10e2qcg in singularity
SoylentRox t1_j4p4loq wrote
Reply to comment by arachnivore in Singularity Mods removed this post about Nick Bostrom defending eugenics by arachnivore
For the same reason we make parents vaccinate their children and send them to school. Because we know what happens if you don't do that.
arachnivore OP t1_j4p5pyf wrote
Jesus christ. There's a line between keeping your children from dying and dictating the color of their skin. Somewhere in the middle there is complicated ground where the answer isn't so clear if something is for the good of a child or eugenics and that definitely deserves discussion, but it's not this bullshit of:
>Hurr! durr! Transhumanism = Eugenics! Hurr! Durr!
That everyone in this post is replying to me with like a bunch of lobotomized dipshits.
The problem is: The mods seem to think burying discussion about the problems of eugenics is a good idea and Nick Bostrom seems to think the main problem is that its frowned upon in academia when you act like a huge bigot, use racial slurs, and spout debunked Nazi "science".
Like, yeah Nick, I'm sure we'd be making way more progress in the field if we just let a bunch of racist trolls publish their "work". That must really be the biggest problem facing the field. \s
SoylentRox t1_j4p649b wrote
At age 22? In 1995? Yeah whatever. I don't care and neither should you.
arachnivore OP t1_j4p6sye wrote
No, idiot. He doubled down on it 7 days ago.
SoylentRox t1_j4p83jv wrote
Good for him
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments