Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

firem1ndr t1_j65dn53 wrote

Reply to comment by Ne_Nel in Asking here and not on an artist subreddit because you guys are non-artists who love AI and I don't want to get coddled. Genuinely, is there any point in continuing to make art when everything artists could ever do will be fundamentally replaceable in a few years? by [deleted]

this is objectively wrong, art is creative expression through human skill and imagination, if you paint a bird and no one sees it it’s still art

1

Ne_Nel t1_j65iapb wrote

I explicitly spoke of the concept of art in a social way. Each individual can consider art what he wants. For you a drawing of a bird is art, but that is only your opinion. The truth is that a drawing is not art, its just a drawing. If that doesn't convey anything to others, what you think is irrelevant.

In the end, the point is that you can't decide for others what is art. It is decided by collective consensus of each culture. That is what you must refute if you want to say that my approach is wrong. Which is not objectively possible, unless you can break the freedom of human thought.

1