Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

crua9 t1_j6jgw0m wrote

>In any case, nothing you said negates my point about UBS.

I was just getting into the part where you're factually incorrect.

>I never said the jobs were replaced 1:1, nor that the same people working at McDonalds would get those jobs.

Then what was the point of the comment?

−1

the68thdimension t1_j6m2b27 wrote

> Then what was the point of the comment?

Because it’s worthwhile to point out the nuance of the situation: it’s not that these jobs are lost and that’s it, but rather these jobs are lost but some others are opened up elsewhere.

It’s still a net negative loss of number of jobs, yes, but it’s not as bad as it’s made out by some.

0