Submitted by blueSGL t3_103jh8h in singularity
TinyBurbz t1_j2zxpha wrote
Reply to comment by PhilosophusFuturum in NYC Bans Students and Teachers from Using ChatGPT by blueSGL
>because of the fact that aging-millennials are a major foundation of the American progressive movement
>
>I'm 25
Bro, you missed the cut off by like two years; you dont get to call millennials "aging" when you are getting your first grey hairs yourself.
What are you gonna do in four years when you are "aging" lmao.
PhilosophusFuturum t1_j2zy1vw wrote
That’s the very young-end of the millennial generation. Millennials are as old as 41 right now. The average millennial is in their 30’s. That’s not old, but it’s at the point where people generally start families, build lives, and begin favoring stability over change.
TinyBurbz t1_j3015xj wrote
Like I said, get a refund on that education.
drekmonger t1_j30dkvb wrote
I've noticed a strong backlash against AI technology in leftist enclaves I frequent, and it's not just the older generations either, but the younger.
Accurately, they predict that AI will primarily serve commercial interests, and that the progression of the technology will make the rich richer. Currently, their arguments are mostly centered around art generation tools from greedy corporations "stealing" from poor artists.
voyaging t1_j30fc57 wrote
Pretty horrifically bad argument with a very plausible conclusion.
TinyBurbz t1_j32o4pm wrote
Almost like those leftist spaces are realistically informed on this technology. They know damn well that GPT and Diffusion just means elimination of skilled labor.
This is not the loom, they are not luddites. The loom let us hire and create more weavers. This technology however, eliminates labor.
drekmonger t1_j32p7ua wrote
> They know damn well that GPT and Diffusion just means elimination of skilled labor.
It's true. I don't deny that at all.
I also think there's absolutely no way to stop it. We need to move forward with the idea that AI is here and is going to improve in leaps, and try to figure out how we can reshape society to benefit.
Because it's happening. Even if we somehow outlaw it in the western world, the Chinese will just keep on trucking.
TinyBurbz t1_j32rb0h wrote
> Even if we somehow outlaw it in the western world, the Chinese will just keep on trucking.
China has done far more to regulate AI than the US already.
drekmonger t1_j32tdu3 wrote
If your idea is to regulate away AI, then you're in for a bad time.
This is a new epoch of human existence. Plan for it happening, instead of fruitlessly trying to fight against the inevitable.
TinyBurbz t1_j32vrdi wrote
>Plan for it happening, instead of fruitlessly trying to fight against the inevitable
UghLook, I am not worried about the future of AI driven ads and Disney+ content Ill never watch. I look forward to enhanced google searches, and the various graphic tools being developed by NVIDIA.
However, I can scant see the benefit to everyday people visible AI technology will provide. Aside from enhanced ad delivery? Wow
drekmonger t1_j3304cs wrote
See if this grabs you as interesting and cool:
https://drektopia.wordpress.com/2022/12/08/building-worlds-with-chatgpt/
People are doing similar things to automate their work, present-tense, using ChatGPT for far more serious subject matter than TTRPGs.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments