GoldenRain t1_j2z549y wrote on January 4, 2023 at 11:19 PM

>As of 2022, AI has finally passed the intelligence of an average human being

This is wrong on so many levels. AI still does not have near human intelligence. It does not learn continuously and adapt on the fly nor does it understand cause and effect.

manOnPavementWaving t1_j2zbwee wrote on January 5, 2023 at 12:04 AM

I agree, but your arguments are soso. It adopts on the fly through in-context learning, learning continuously is just a way of implementation, and it actually does have a decent understanding of cause and effect.

Borrowedshorts t1_j30db4j wrote on January 5, 2023 at 4:32 AM

Agreed, cause and effect has already been demonstrated on much lesser models. Seems OP is making up randomly stated limitations and hoping it sticks.

Borrowedshorts t1_j30d0cx wrote on January 5, 2023 at 4:30 AM

In some ways, it already has way more intelligence even compared to >90th percentile humans. ChatGPT can write a good quality 5 page essay in seconds that might take most humans at least 5 hours. It has a breadth of knowledge that few humans can match. No it doesn't learn continuously, but I'd say in some ways it is pretty adaptive and cause and effect really isn't that difficult.

TopicRepulsive7936 t1_j32qylr wrote on January 5, 2023 at 5:38 PM

But you see, we want exact human like intelligence, it doesn't matter we already have 10 billion of them.

LoquaciousAntipodean t1_j2zhgrb wrote on January 5, 2023 at 12:42 AM

Your stumbling point is in your understanding of what 'intelligence' even is; psychologists have understood for years that there's no such thing as 'raw intelligence', there is only ever, and has only ever been, contextual, situational intelligence. We (that is, human society) cannot even agree on what 'IQ' is even supposed to be measuring, much less agree that it is a useful metric of anything very much.

Intelligence is a process, not a thing; it's the fire, and not the smoke. We won't get very far in understanding the nature of the fire of intelligence, if we just keep mucking around looking at the different bits of firewood, and trying to spot patterns in the smoke... We need to think deeper about it.

ginger_gcups t1_j30ksah wrote on January 5, 2023 at 5:39 AM

That could easily describe about 50% of my neighbours, coworkers, customers.... /s

AdminsBurnInAFire t1_j33m6ri wrote on January 5, 2023 at 8:41 PM

I can’t believe such a subjective comment got so many upvotes. Are you the arbiter of human intelligence?

I cannot believe people are still handwaving away the magnitude of AI intelligence in such a short time. 4 years ago and these things were cripples.