Submitted by flowday t3_10gxy2t in singularity
ArgentStonecutter t1_j56sxck wrote
Reply to comment by BadassGhost in AGI by 2024, the hard part is now done ? by flowday
Computers have been better than humans at an increasing number of tasks since before WWII. Many of these tasks, like Chess and Go, were once touted as requiring 'real' intelligence. No possible list of such tasks is even meaningful.
BadassGhost t1_j570h0y wrote
Then what would be meaningful? What would convince you that something is close to AGI, but not yet AGI?
For me, this is exactly what I would expect to see if something was almost AGI but not yet there.
The difference from previous specialized AI is that these models are able to learn seemingly any concept, both in training and after training (in context). Things that are out of distribution can be taught with a single digit number of examples.
(I am not the one downvoting you)
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments