Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

sideways t1_j4o2feq wrote

People said the same thing about Go.

But when it comes to art, what does "surpass" even mean? Did Steinbeck surpass Tolkien? Did Picasso surpass Klimt?

It's a meaningless question. What matters is whether AI will be able to create works that are meaningful and moving to humans - and I believe that it will.

10

VictoryObvious6612 t1_j4p8kq5 wrote

Go is solvable algorithmically.

Creating characters, plots and themes isn't. This will never happen.

0

MassiveIndependence8 t1_j4xyn0h wrote

That’s what the artist said

1

VictoryObvious6612 t1_j4y7zzx wrote

Kind of proves my point. AI art programs are good at making pretty renders. It's on par with calendar art. They aren't doing anything with any kind of message or thematic depth and almost certainly never will. You can get away with that in visual media, but not if you're trying to write a whole fucking novel.

1

MassiveIndependence8 t1_j4y8cww wrote

Lmao, sure bro RemindMe! 2 years

1