>We are evidently only allowed to read about villains in human-authored media, or journalism, but AI-generated villains are currently deemed unacceptable for human consumption.

Are they deemed "unacceptable for human consumption" or are they deemed "potentially unprofitable if available for human consumption"? Chat GPT is a business product that's open to the masses. It's a fine-tuned version of the less-restricted GPT3.5, which isn't available to the public.\

>Do you believe such limitations are compatible with the kind of AI generation we can presume will serve as foundation for the singularity?

I don't think the publicly available products will do so, no. But the actual tech, unconstrained by the need to generate good PR and rope in investors? Much more likely.