Submitted by tiny9000 t3_10ozzqp in singularity
LyubomirIko t1_j6icj0k wrote
Reply to comment by alexiuss in How long till we enter the age of abundance? by tiny9000
Because they aren't allowed to compete with real humans.
The same way machines aren't allowed to compete with athletes on the Olympic stadium. If machines are allowed to compete with real humans on the Olympic stadium and the other sport events - quickly the real athletes will be outperformed and won't be able to sustain their professional career.
There is no regulation about AI in arts however, so real humans art will only become something luxurious and less real artist will exists.
alexiuss t1_j6idnoi wrote
Athletes make money at stadiums by being allowed to be there.
In real life, lots of comicons have already banned AI art. It's a similar irl barrier.
Artists make the most money through human connections, AI can't take that away.
Yes, there will obviously be less of some cheap 2d artists that depend on internet showcase, but as trade there will be more AI using artists that make multimedia projects like games and movies - the barrier of entry to produce multimedia projects is way lower now.
LyubomirIko t1_j6ikg4e wrote
Athletes and chess players makes living by not competing with machines, because there is regulations.
Already small freelance artists are being replaced by AI and they have to quit and find other job. Even medium companies are cutting their experienced artist staff because they can make more profit by replacing them. Few visual industries was known to be exploiting artists anyway. It was already hard profession to be sustaining family from.
AI have the intention to replace human to human interaction anyway. There is a sighs that technology is altering our genetics or at least there is obvious boom of autism spectrum disorders.
Seeing in the future where your teacher will be an AI, the doctor will be an AI, your girl/boy friend will be an AI, the psychotherapist will be AI and so on - will just make matters worse.
Real artists are being overwhelmed and buried under ton or so called AI "art". AI "art" is real art the way deep fakes are real people. Just a mimicry that exploit the not mature ethics and morality of society. Plagiarism and mimicking, mostly not based on transformative content, but derivative that hurts directly the real artists on which is based. Artists have the full right to protest against immaturity of society that allows it.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments