Not sure I understand what you're saying. The "story" is fiction, right?

You understand the interesting thing isn't the story as an end, but as a mean?

The exception might be what would be considered consumer art, the bottom common denominator type?

>then describe the creative process and what influenced it in a similar way that a human would.

You mean invent, right? What "influenced" it isn't based on anything lived. So its basically just a lie.

>The only difference being one is simulated

I feel like that's a pretty big difference lmao 🤣 Again, unless you're incapable to relate to others experiences. In that case, you probably don't care. But that's a minority of abnormal humans