SnooDonkeys5480 t1_j2nysrk wrote
Reply to comment by TheTomatoBoy9 in Could a robot ever recreate the aura of a Leonardo da Vinci masterpiece? It’s already happening | Naomi Rea by [deleted]
ChatGPT can write a poem and then describe the creative process and what influenced it in a similar way that a human would. Character.AI does a pretty good job interpreting paintings as well.
In reality it's just analyzing what it generated and creating a convincing narrative, but the "story" aspect will be on par with humans soon enough. The only difference being one is simulated. It'll be interesting to see if in the future, when multimodal AIs can be trained on images and form a unique interpretation, people become fans of a specific AI character's art style.
TheTomatoBoy9 t1_j2o42dx wrote
Not sure I understand what you're saying. The "story" is fiction, right?
You understand the interesting thing isn't the story as an end, but as a mean?
The exception might be what would be considered consumer art, the bottom common denominator type?
>then describe the creative process and what influenced it in a similar way that a human would.
You mean invent, right? What "influenced" it isn't based on anything lived. So its basically just a lie.
>The only difference being one is simulated
I feel like that's a pretty big difference lmao 🤣 Again, unless you're incapable to relate to others experiences. In that case, you probably don't care. But that's a minority of abnormal humans
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments