Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

EnomLee OP t1_j21io8t wrote

"Soon, Hollywood could be in direct competition with generative AI tools, which, unlike self-driving cars or other long-promised technologies that never quite arrive, are already here and getting better fast. Meta and Google have announced software that converts text prompts into short videos; another tool, Phenaki, can do whole scenes. None of these video generators has been released to the public yet, but the company D-ID offers an AI app that can make people in still photos blink and read from a script, and some have been using it to animate characters created by Midjourney. “In the next few years,” says Matthew Kershaw, D-ID’s VP of marketing and growth, “we could easily see a major movie made almost entirely using AI.” Someday, instead of browsing our Rokus for something to watch, we might green-light our own entertainment by pitching loglines to algorithms that can make feature-length films with sophisticated plots, blockbuster effects, and A-list human actors from any era."

20

Johnny_Glib t1_j21mt7s wrote

Also making our own video games as well.

Not sure it'll be soon though. Maybe 10 to 20 years. Exciting when it happens.

22

iNstein t1_j21ry2h wrote

There are a few book series I would like to read but I may just wait and then when this tech is around, I'll just feed it the text from these books and get the film generated for me. Billion dollar budget blockbuster equivalent generated just for me.

Also with existing movies, we should be able to feed the movie into the system and then ask for a sequel to be generated. Same style and following up the storyline and themes.

9

Artanthos t1_j21sxr5 wrote

I doubt it will be legal without licensing fees, if that is an option.

Authors and artists are already turning to the courts. Direct conversion of a specific creators works via AI will almost certainly not pass legal challenges.

0

Evil_Patriarch t1_j2224v3 wrote

Finally I can give Surf Ninjas the sequel it deserves!

15

blueSGL t1_j22coeu wrote

I honestly don't know if people are not factoring in the investment that is going to start flowing into the sector, now that even the slowest companies can see: 1. how good things have got and 2. how quickly they are evolving.

No one will want to be the last person at the table.

5

TheSecretAgenda t1_j22eoju wrote

I think you will see this technology by the end of the decade. Not for personal use but, movie studios are going to snap this up as soon as it is available. Animation first but, then live action. Everyone that works in Hollywood will be at risk.

4

leonidganzha t1_j22ffcj wrote

>generative AI tools, which, unlike self-driving cars or other long-promised technologies that never quite arrive, are already here and getting better fast

Self-driving has been here for years and has been getting better the whole time. The problem is it's not a toy and it has a more or less long way to go to get good enough. AI generated art is also far from being good enough, but because nobody cares about what is good art, it has a very low bar.

Speaking seriously, of course AI is not a competitor to Hollywood, it's a competitor to the tools VFX studios currently use, like Adobe suite, Maya, Blender etc. And the developers of these tools are currently working on incorporating AI stuff into them. So the same Hollywood studios will be the first to adopt new AI tools, not some random dudes with gaming GPUs.

1

Mountain-Award7440 t1_j233ipv wrote

It’s crazy how fast these ideas spread in the age of social media. I felt like I was super early coming to this sub and a few of us having these predictions of using AI to generate custom blockbuster films in the near future. A month later the exact same idea and timeline is gaining traction on publications like Vulture.

8

iNstein t1_j23pcmr wrote

The idea is for personal use only, not selling it to anyone. If I read the book and imagine what it is like in that world, I'm not going to be sued, I just have an aide to help me with my imagination. Honestly, I don't live in the US and courts don't accept bs copyright claims here so I don't see that as an issue at all.

2

Artanthos t1_j24e9ob wrote

The AI itself won’t be on your system, and it will be regulated.

Even if you live somewhere like China that doesn’t enforce copyright, you will still need access to the AI that is subject to copyright laws.

China, meanwhile, is already regulating AI generated content.

0

biogoly t1_j24jh1a wrote

Why couldn’t it be on a local system? These models are all going to have open sourced equivalents eventually. Even massive models like GPT-3 could be run locally by an enthusiast, or a small group collaborative effort. It will only get cheaper in the future. Same goes for model training. You can’t close Pandora’s box.

5

Artanthos t1_j24mwgg wrote

This goes right back to closed systems.

The companies with the advanced AI’s are not going to give you copies to run on your private computer.

It’s going to be software as a service.

1

TemetN t1_j25ivw1 wrote

I agree with the title premise, but the articles discussion of attempts to attack the public over copyright if anything disturbs me. I'm entirely fine with AI remaining outside copyright honestly, or just doing away with the system in general.

3

Longjumping_Pilgirm t1_j25vywr wrote

I can't wait to plug in some of the best fanfiction ever written and see it come out as a great movie or tv series out the other end. First thing I might put in is Battlestar Prometheus.

3