Submitted by thetwitchy1 t3_zwm1p1 in singularity
Thundergawker t1_j1zm5jk wrote
Reply to comment by Tanglemix in AI art is the ‘machine made fabric’ of tomorrow. by thetwitchy1
This. AI art might well be the best thing to happen for artists.
Also it's really good for reference, I had a commission recently and instead of wasting my energy looking for good reference on Google, I just prompted midjourney, and in seconds I had the data I need to visualize what i wanted to make in my minds eye.
Tanglemix t1_j26azd1 wrote
Could you see a scenario in which your clients simply bypassed you and used Midjourney themselves to create the image they wanted?
I ask because this idea seems to be almost an article of faith among many AI Art enthusiasts- they are convinced that AI art in the near future will eliminate the role of the human artist in most commercial contexts.
Personaly I don't find this idea credible for a number of reasons- not the least of which is the fact that very often people who commission art don't really have a clear idea or vision at the start of a project, which is why they hire an artist in the first place.
A commercial artist is not simply a device for rendering images- there is a collaboration involved that current AI image generators lack the ability to provide.
And there is a real problem- at least in my view- with the idea that words and images are fungible- they really are not. Even the most detailed and comprehensive written description of a face is a poor substitute for a simple photograph. No one ever commisioned a portrait by sending the painter a written account of what the subject looked like- because we all understand that the idea of creating art just by talking to your tools is like the idea of playing the piano while wearing mittens- entertaining perhaps, but sadly lacking in the precision required to get the job done.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments