Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

sumane12 t1_j0ox0qc wrote

Unless there's scientific discoveries not immediately obvious that would facilitate a quicker development of AI.

8

Desperate_Food7354 OP t1_j0ox5ws wrote

More in regards to biology and medical discoveries. (Super complex interactions between organic compounds and proteins etc), just way beyond something like particle physics in terms of predicting outcomes.

1

machineElf2122 t1_j0oz8i5 wrote

It’s not a funding or time issue. It’s just that there’s too little people interested in studying 10+ years for a career in AI.

1

blueSGL t1_j0ozrsf wrote

I would far prefer more people get into alignment, well at least the important kind (paperclip output) not the distraction (problematic output)

As the planet then light cone gets turned into paperclips an AI 'alignment' researcher can at least warm themselves with the thought that "well at least the AI never said a bad word"

2

Professional-Song216 t1_j0p0uiy wrote

Possibly, but I think that you need “pillars” to support the “building” were trying to make. If we never optimized smart phone cameras and the internet I don’t think we would have the proper infrastructure to train our current AI models.

3

anaIconda69 t1_j0p1eio wrote

Real world =/= video game tech tree. You can't simply assign "research" toward a goal.

4

thEiAoLoGy t1_j0p1x3a wrote

Its not that long for adjacent careers but like we’re already making good money and its better to slow roll most change. The pace of progress is already causing the townsfolk to gather pitchforks, it’s on us to demonstrate how it’ll make their lives better… which takes time and application of the tech.

Ideally we start pumping out media content at an insane rate.

2