Comments
rramrram t1_izcehsr wrote
> We adapted existing deep reinforcement learning for this purpose. It took the algorithm on the order of one day to learn and then about one hour to build the lattice.
Such potential for learning and problem solving skills is my favorite thing about AI. I can only imagine if they were fully let free to make better AI who's better at making better AIs and so on, aka a high level of constant self updating. The exponential speed of growth for these skills is out of my limited comprehension, so are the results of it. This world as we know it will be no more in a future not as far as our society might think.
Sashinii t1_izcis2w wrote
When do you think the nanofactory will be created? My guess is 2029, but since you seem to think the singularity will happen by 2025, I'm guessing you think it's around that time, right?
Dr_Singularity OP t1_izcj94u wrote
This decade :)
HumanBeing-1994 t1_izctiyv wrote
I do have the same feeling
ihateshadylandlords t1_izctuey wrote
What would a molecular assembler do? Does it mean it could build anything we want?
ReasonablyBadass t1_izdc1qs wrote
A single one obviously would take forever to build anything useful, but could hundreds of these "arms" be in use at the same time, on the same object?
z0rm t1_izdfk4o wrote
Naah molecular assemblers probably won't become available for consumers until 2050-2070
sumane12 t1_izegoqu wrote
Pretty much, it assembles from the molecules, so as long as you have the raw material, your good to go
Dr_Singularity OP t1_izbyzop wrote
molecular assembler is nearer