Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

TheLastSamurai t1_j1x5bpx wrote

No we don’t. We can stop it literally right now. Governments are overthrown, corporations are dismantled, organized motivated and angry people change the course of history. This quasi religious fate acompli attitude is very bizzare

1

Calm_Bonus_6464 t1_j1x5pvl wrote

So you want to stop the development of AI? Because AGI/ASI and Singularity inevitably means the above happens. The only way to stop it is to halt technological progress.

2

TheLastSamurai t1_j1x5t1x wrote

I’d be ok with that yes

2

Calm_Bonus_6464 t1_j1x64vo wrote

Well, that's not going to happen to be blunt. And given all the possibilities for good, I wouldn't want AI progress to stop.

4

TheLastSamurai t1_j1x680o wrote

Massive regulation is coming

−1

Calm_Bonus_6464 t1_j1x6ega wrote

Even if it came in the West, China isn't going to stop developing AI simply because the West chooses to regulate it.

And good luck regulating a being more intelligent than you once ASI happens.

8

Webemperor t1_j1xwzus wrote

China is unironically more likely to regulate AI than any other government in the world in the off chance that one of their corporations make greater advancements in AI than them and overthrows them.

In West this is extremely unlikely since Western governments are essentially owned by corporations

2

Calm_Bonus_6464 t1_j1xympq wrote

> In West this is extremely unlikely since Western governments are essentially owned by corporations

US perhaps, but not Europe. I could actually see the EU attempting to regulate it.

2

Webemperor t1_j1y3zjj wrote

> I could actually see the EU attempting to regulate it.

Bro EU was literally created to serve coal and energy companies, EU is just as corporately owned as US is, at best only slightly less.

1

Calm_Bonus_6464 t1_j1y5so5 wrote

It depends, countries like France and Portugal probably aren't that different from the US, but northern European countries like Denmark, Finland, Sweden, Switzerland, Germany etc have the lowest levels of corruption in the world and are Europe's leaders in AI and big playmakers in EU decisions.

1

WikiSummarizerBot t1_j1y5tpq wrote

Corruption Perceptions Index

>The Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) is an index which ranks countries "by their perceived levels of public sector corruption, as determined by expert assessments and opinion surveys". The CPI generally defines corruption as an "abuse of entrusted power for private gain". The index is published annually by the non-governmental organisation Transparency International since 1995. The 2021 CPI, published in January 2022, currently ranks 180 countries "on a scale from 100 (very clean) to 0 (highly corrupt)" based on the situation between 1 May 2020 and 30 April 2021.

^([ )^(F.A.Q)^( | )^(Opt Out)^( | )^(Opt Out Of Subreddit)^( | )^(GitHub)^( ] Downvote to remove | v1.5)

1

Webemperor t1_j1y6uc6 wrote

Levels of corruption doesn't mean jackshit when corporate interference is pretty much baked into the system.

1

Calm_Bonus_6464 t1_j1y6wmx wrote

Can you give an example of that in Finland or Denmark?

1

Webemperor t1_j1y73ak wrote

The fact that they are a part of EU? I already told you, the organization was literally created, and exists, to protect corporate interests throughout the continent.

1

No_Ask_994 t1_j1zeh8y wrote

Maybe.

The thing is, the country that doesn't stop ai development Will become the World leader in a few years/decades (depending on the starting position and resources....)

So I dont Think that any country Will stay out of the party. It might get regulated and controlled by goverments, and so, slow down, but AI Will keep going.

Anyway even uf they wanted it's imposible to stop without controlling computing power. In 20 years one Will probably be able to train a gpt-3 sized model in minutes in a personal computer

1