mocha_sweetheart OP t1_j1rtpgk wrote
Reply to comment by No_Ninja3309_NoNoYes in Genuine question, why wouldn’t AI, posthumanism, post-singularity benefits etc. become something reserved for the elites? by mocha_sweetheart
“Government pressure” doesn’t amount to much when lobbying politicians with wealth beyond most of us can imagine, bribery etc. are VERY well known as things billionaires often do to further their goals; Pardon my vulgarity, but the government has long been the billionaires’ bitch, at least in the US. For example, you know oil moguls lobby politicians to ban green energy in certain areas so they remain reliant on oil? Let alone with some newfangled AI technology which has even MORE of an incentive to keep them in power with.
Public outcry? Yeah, good luck with that. Rich people have already killed people who lobby tons of times in the past, like the coca cola company paying assassins to do that etc. I’m sure they’d have no issues doing it when they can get an AI to do the same level or better of work, or just threaten everyone to fall back in line.
Cryptizard t1_j1ry5sp wrote
When have rich people ever tried to keep a technology to themselves? It doesn't make sense on its face. The only things that are exclusive to rich people are very rare and supply can't be increased, like real estate, precious gems, supercars, etc.
mocha_sweetheart OP t1_j1s63p3 wrote
Insulin in the US a patent sold for 1 dollar and now insulin marked up hundreds of dollars, patent system etc.
TheDavidMichaels t1_j1s09qt wrote
i get it, your a Chinese bot, evil US capitalisms ,, shut up china bot
mocha_sweetheart OP t1_j1s5us5 wrote
- Try actually debating someone’s viewpoint instead of slinging personal attacks
- Nah, I’m an anarchocommunist, China’s system is not the kind of thing i support
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments