Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Akimbo333 t1_ixl5btn wrote

What's the difference between this and the others?

11

-ZeroRelevance- t1_ixlibbg wrote

Basically just bigger and better than the previous ones afaik. The only really notable change I saw was that it has a new depth-detection model for more consistent variations.

9

Akimbo333 t1_ixm00kh wrote

Oh ok. Are the hands and faces better?

3

-ZeroRelevance- t1_ixm0kfw wrote

Faces look better, hands still look pretty bad though. There’s some sample images in the linked post if you want to have a look, and there should be some on r/stablediffusion now too.

7

Akimbo333 t1_ixm1wjn wrote

Thanks! But I also heard that the model was pretty regressive as fuck! Because it Filtered out nudity Celebrities And artist styles

6

-ZeroRelevance- t1_ixm2x7d wrote

The nudity stuff doesn’t really matter, since it will definitely be recreated with custom models anyways, but I didn’t realise about the celebrities and artists. That will definitely be a big blow to the model, since celebrities are in a lot of the prompts that people will try for the first time, and artists are a great way to guide images into certain styles. Hopefully the community can resolve those limitations, but you’re right that it’s pretty limiting.

Also, if they removed a bunch of artists from the dataset, that means removing a massive amount of high-quality training data, which likely has significantly reduced the potential of the model. Looks like a bad move from every side but a PR one.

10