Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

[deleted] t1_ixiofbz wrote

Reply to comment by ArgentStonecutter in Lex Fridman's father is pro-immortality by SpiritedSort672

[deleted]

1

SpiritedSort672 OP t1_ixj3rmp wrote

I'm not claiming to know what happens after death. By "pro-death fallacies" I meant the statements that Lex makes about death being necessary for life to have meaning.

1

ArgentStonecutter t1_ixipnk4 wrote

I'm just objecting to you using NDEs as evidence.

You prefer "fantasies" then? Unless you're one of Heinlein's "true witnesses" you have to demand some level of support for anything you're going to stand for. Complaining that the word "fallacy" implies there's active proof against something that is basically 100% made up without any basis for considering it any more seriously than the Great Green Akleseizure or the Flying Spaghetti Monster is just churlish. You know it's nonsense.

0

[deleted] t1_ixiq6x3 wrote

[deleted]

1

ArgentStonecutter t1_ixiqkc5 wrote

No straw man. You brought up NDEs as support for your argument. I'm objecting to using NDEs as support for your argument. If you agree that they're not support for your argument after all, we're done.

Then you brought up "we can't argue about it because we don't REALLY know anything". We actually do know quite a lot, so THAT's a total straw man, but whatever. It's still not evidence that NDEs are evidence for anything.

1

[deleted] t1_ixiu2kf wrote

[deleted]

1

ArgentStonecutter t1_ixiulku wrote

They're not data.

1

[deleted] t1_ixiym6d wrote

[deleted]

1

ArgentStonecutter t1_ixiyvcy wrote

Completely unrelated. Even if there is some continuity of memory Beyond Death there is no reason to assume that it is anything but a dead record and has nothing to do with consciousness.

1