Submitted by Singularian2501 t3_yuez22 in singularity
Singularian2501 OP t1_iw9mksu wrote
Reply to comment by rixtil41 in Theories of consciousness - Seth, A.K. and Bayne, T. (2022). by Singularian2501
Lets say science detemines in the future that consciousness is just thoughts about thoughts ( Higher oder Theory ) then you could look after that pattern or functionality in artifical neural networks and this way determine if that machine is conscious or not. In a way there a possible consciousness patterns that need to be determined if the are valid or a few of them together ( the ones I prefer ( Infografic ) in combination are a logical answer to me ) . After that you only need to look after these patterns in machine intelligences or other live forms. It´s only pattern matching and validation after that. I don´t accept magic or metaphysic as an answer for consciousness because metaphysic will become just physic when the definitive answer is found what consciousness is.
Scientific_Thinking t1_iwbswzq wrote
anyone who implies consciousness is metaphysical or something beyond observable science is just a bufoon.
Human-Ad9798 t1_iwcc1hw wrote
Define observable science
Scientific_Thinking t1_iwcu3ah wrote
something we can record, get data for, and create knowledge from.
Human-Ad9798 t1_iwh9tah wrote
I see, I agree that it's not metaphysical
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments