Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

whenhaveiever t1_iweikls wrote

Haven't read the whole thing yet, but I like this.

UFO/UAP people talk about the "five observables," which they tend to interpret as technology that lets solid objects do things solid objects usually can't, but I think the more straightforward interpretation is that UAPs aren't solid. I was thinking some kind of laser tech, and a proton beam isn't that far off.

2

tikkymykk t1_ivslqde wrote

The whole article takes lazar's hypothetical, and debunks it with another hypothetical.

1

ElMikolArisen t1_ivsmvh3 wrote

I disagree, there's plenty evidence (and many links) debunking specific claims made by Lazar.

I think you made up your mind too fast. Evidence is never enough to convince a Believer.

2

tikkymykk t1_ivsojbw wrote

Damn so he made it up. Gave it another chance by researching thoroughly myself. Found direct evidence.

I guess you were right about lazar. Wrong about me.

2