Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Singularian2501 t1_ivb8fv2 wrote

Github Link or a paper? You don´t even have a screenshot of the conversations or how the code works. As long as that is the case I will not give you an upvote!

I only don´t give you a downvote right now because I like the idea.

4

Reddituser45005 t1_ivbmo27 wrote

Researchers understand the importance of contextual memory and a lot of different paths are being explored by various AI researchers. Like most things related to understanding and mimicking human intelligence, it seems simple in general terms but frustratingly difficult in real terms. Humans have long and short term memory. We have sense memories of scents, and images and sounds. We attach varying levels of emotional significance to certain memories. We attach different levels of relevance and importance to different memories. We attach memories to specific places and people and times. A database of previous conversations misses all the nuances that people attach to memory. It may have some value to a chatbot but the idea as you have outlined it is not new. I am not being critical. It’s all in the implementation and I don’t know enough to vote yay or nay in your project. Good luck

1

Longjumping-Sky-1971 t1_ivc7xni wrote

Character.ai if you haven’t already seen it. Seems easier enough for them to have certain domain expert bots and lower hallucinations.

1

GoldenHolden01 t1_ivccwnd wrote

Replying to [deleted] (#459,106)

All I see is still 0 proof. If it’s easy to do, surely it’s even easier to take a few screenshots at the bare ass minimum.

“What’s that? You don’t care what people think?”

Well, you obviously do, seeing that you’re posting publicly here. If you wanted feedback you would have attached something tangible to go on. Since you didn’t, you’re obviously here for clout.

1