Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

DungeonsAndDradis t1_iu3uzct wrote

This article is over 4 years old.

35

sniperjack t1_iu42a16 wrote

that is the only important point about this post. No need to read any further really.

16

Kolinnor t1_iu3i636 wrote

Quite a misleading title for the article (as far as I understood the argumentation which is only nitpicking on acronyms ?). It's quite long, I wouldn't bother reading it

9

Awkward-Loan t1_iu3qh0n wrote

Sound like Mike's pissed that we use the term AI because of a lack of engineering put in its use. Half the problem is I feel he wants AI to be of use in is considered high risk liabilities, thus not worth the insurance like in the medical field. He has a lot of valid points thought, it would be a great advantage to use AI to find mistakes in all scopes. What Mike didn't know is I've been working on such a system and when I wanted to see competition, I came to find out there was only one. It is not worth me competing with them as I would struggle to get funding to build a super computer, but they might. My choice was clear, I will propose a collaboration. This is where I am now and without trust it's difficult, but once gained I feel like I would have less work to do by myself (I don't have a PC, all my computing is done on paper by hand) and this whole project will rocket! Viva la Revolution!

1

visarga t1_iu7real wrote

Ah, the famous Michael Jordan of AI.

He's like Hinton, Yann LeCun, Bengio and Schmidthuber, built some of the foundations of AI in his career.

1