Submitted by Redvolition t3_y9y50l in singularity
BearStorms t1_it9dxcx wrote
Reply to comment by DrKrepz in Thoughts on Job Loss Due to Automation by Redvolition
Yeah, well, you know, that's just like, your opinion, man. We can discuss endlessly about "what is art?". By some definition, maybe even the most mainstream one, AI (or computers in general) have been creating art for decades...
DrKrepz t1_it9my90 wrote
Humans use machines to create art. Machines don't do it autonomously. We barely need to define art to establish that humans are still necessary for any AI image generator to function at all.
swazhr t1_it9tiai wrote
0,1,1,2,3,5,8,13,21,34
BearStorms t1_it9ym9d wrote
There you go, beautiful art!
BearStorms t1_it9ykr1 wrote
You can absolutely create a program that generates infinite number of random pretty images, it is actually quite trivial to do. It's gotta exist somewhere, let's say a GPT-3 creates an interesting prompt and then Stable Diffusion generates the image. Anyone knows about something like this?
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments