Submitted by kmtrp t3_y6gvwe in singularity
Thelmara t1_ist91tc wrote
Reply to comment by Yuli-Ban in Talked to people minimizing/negating potential AI impact in their field? eg: artists, coders... by kmtrp
>To be fair... AI researchers for the past 67 years were using computers too weak to even sufficiently run some of the programs they theorized were necessary for AI to work.
Seems like they'd have taken that into account when making their predictions, yeah?
Yuli-Ban t1_iste3ag wrote
They really weren't, at least not realistically, especially during the first AI boo. Men using electric bricks they tried calling computers predicted they'd have human level AI within ten years of 1960.
Thelmara t1_isteziq wrote
Ah, but this time it's different, eh? Cool
Yuli-Ban t1_istf5xi wrote
Need only look back at the past two to three years of developments to make that call.
Did GPT-3 or DALL-E 2 happen in the 1980s? Could they have? No? QED.
szuruburuszuru t1_istj934 wrote
Bruh, that’s not even a proof.
johndburger t1_istelt3 wrote
I see no reason to think we won’t be saying the same thing about today’s computers in thirty years. In fact I’m pretty sure we will be saying that because, again, that’s consistent with history.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments