Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Jmbolmt t1_ismc6k6 wrote

My aunt died last week falling off a loading dock as she was moving boxes. She worked as a lunch lady at an elementary school. There are some jobs that just should not be for people. She was my daughter’s god mother. And now she is gone.

12

starfyredragon t1_ismjk4v wrote

Well, if you like people dying in the streets because they don't have the money to meet life's needs.

Like I said, I'm cool with it if we can get some solid socialism in to make sure work isn't neccesarry to survive, but if it is neccesarry to survive, eliminating jobs is premature.

2

justowen4 t1_isobs10 wrote

Pff it’s just china in that data. We aren’t going to see the exponential robot usage until it’s smart enough to handle edge cases. It’s still the same assembly line robots that we have been using for generations

3

starfyredragon t1_isru5sc wrote

Whey? AIs currently get most of their resources as a direct benefit of human selfishness. From an evolutionary perspective, that makes little sense.

Don't get me wrong, I'm a big fan of the advancement of technology, but I'm also aware that the right technology in the wrong hands can be very wrong; and we're currently in that predicament.

2

RichardChesler t1_ist87qe wrote

I think it’s a problem AI needs to fix or else it threatens it’s own exisitence. It’s pretty clear that human ambition is the likliest existential threat to humanity, and by extension AI’s

Maybe I’m just being optimistic. I don’t even want to think of the pessimist case

1

starfyredragon t1_istac7i wrote

Well, I'm personally of the mind that I'm going to go full brain-upload as soon as reasonable, so I constantly think about what it'd be like to be a consciousness existing on a stable silicon substrate.

And thinking from this angle, if production & use of repair parts can be automated to where human intervention isn't neccesarry (very likely as the majority of the computer manufacture supply chain is automated), there's actually little need for humans... or any organic life, for that matter; in other words, there's far easier methods than fixing humanity's plethora of problems. All the neccesarry components for an AI's survival can be mined, and don't have any needs that are required to be supplied by a biosphere.

I'm a compassionate individual, so I'd probably still do it, but I recognize there'd be no required impetus for someone who didn't grow up human.

1