Submitted by intergalacticskyline t3_xyb4h0 in singularity
dilznup t1_irhw3u4 wrote
Reply to comment by NativeEuropeas in When do you think we'll have AGI, if at all? by intergalacticskyline
Oh my god dude, you make an assumption and then are unable to develop your perspective. That's anti-discussion.
NativeEuropeas t1_irhwsd7 wrote
I'm not here to stroke my ego, I don't need to win every internet talk, and I'll be gladly proven wrong.
The dude who replied above didn't really engaged in a discussion, didn't ask me "why do you think so?" , instead went in with stupid questions that didn't lead nowhere.
dilznup t1_irhwwbz wrote
He asked for your definition of sentience, that's a crucial point to understand your argument, and you're the one who refused to develop. You were not attacked at this point.
NativeEuropeas t1_irhx77e wrote
I understand that but what is the purpose of asking general definitions when the information is available at Wikipedia? My answer wouldn't really be that different from what is available to the general public.
dilznup t1_irhxktq wrote
There is an active debate about what sentience is, and depending on what you put in the word, it could explain why you see AGI happening later than most voters.
Ashamed-Asparagus-93 t1_irlxscw wrote
So we can see your perspective and better understand your opinion on the matter, that's the purpose
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments