Submitted by intergalacticskyline t3_xyb4h0 in singularity
sumane12 t1_irgazhf wrote
Depends on how you define AGI, very primitive agi by 2030, human level AGI by 2035
DungeonsAndDradis t1_irit0yi wrote
I like the Coffee Test (from Steve Wozniak): (Number 2 on this page) https://analyticsindiamag.com/5-ways-to-test-whether-agi-has-truly-arrived/
Basically, put an ai-powered robot in a random house in America and instruct it to make a cup of coffee.
sumane12 t1_iriy7pl wrote
So I see a few problems with this, number one, some of the smartest people I know make terrible coffee. Number 2 I'm sure some people with really low intelligence can make great coffee, I can also imagine a closed system narrow AI to be trained on enough data to complete this task with no general intelligence, fun fact, I just asked gpt2 to describe the steps in making a cup of coffee and it was extremely close, (apart from boiling the water) so much so that gpt3 would have no issue with it I'm guessing. Add some image recognition, some motor function and I'm pretty sure a few current AIs could accomplish this in 99% of situations.
DungeonsAndDradis t1_irj17jb wrote
The coffee doesn't have to be good.
The AI needs to be to a level that it can control a robot, not just write out text steps for making coffee.
The step we're missing is the general intelligence to control a robot and actually make the coffee.
MercuriusExMachina t1_irjy40o wrote
Now that's an AI expert...
Sebrosen1 t1_irkr5gl wrote
Doesn't seem far off https://techcrunch.com/2022/08/16/google-robotics/
SlowCrates t1_irjfqcy wrote
I'm less intimated putting an alternator in a car than I am by a coffee machine, because I hate coffee and don't drink it.
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_irgl3aw wrote
AGI is has one (1) exact definition. Sorry.
sumane12 t1_irgqb5a wrote
Yea but that's not true tho.
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_irgsogq wrote
Explain. How many definitions have you come across.
sumane12 t1_irhve4c wrote
Intelligence of smartest human.
Intelligence of dumbest human.
Intelligence of average human.
Human intelligence and sentient.
Human intelligence and not sentient.
Generalise from one task to a second.
Generalise from one task to multiple tasks.
Generalise from one task to every task achievable to a human.
Generalise from one task to every task achievable by every human.
The 'G' in AGI stands for general meaning any AI that is able to generalise skills from one to another, eg being trained on go, and transfering those skills to chess. That is the simplest definition of AGI.
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_iridvf0 wrote
Define all of those words you used I can't understand anything you said.
sumane12 t1_irif2r9 wrote
Google works
TopicRepulsive7936 t1_irifok4 wrote
Define google.
sumane12 t1_iriwdqi wrote
Yes
subdep t1_irhi2u5 wrote
AGI == Human level intelligence
The problem is that humans have a wide spectrum of intelligence. I believe you were making the first point, and the other person was trying to make the other point.
I think that we can all agree that regardless of AGI intelligence levels, once we get something smarter than any single human that’s ever existed, then we are in ASI territory.
[deleted] t1_irgu3su wrote
[deleted]
TheSingulatarian t1_iri68vt wrote
I think there are at least 4 levels of AGI.
AGI on the level of a child or a slow human.
AGI at IQ 100 average human intelligence
AGI ate 120 IQ above average human intelligence
AGI at 140 to 170 IQ genius level human intellingence
The fifth level ASI far beyond a level of intelligence that humans are capable of achieving.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments