Submitted by naturethesupreme t3_xw37bb in singularity
naturethesupreme OP t1_ir86pva wrote
Reply to comment by TrainingAfternoon860 in Creating a Research group to study and try to solve the ageing problem. by naturethesupreme
We grow old and die, lose function etc
TrainingAfternoon860 t1_ir86szv wrote
Hows that a problem it’s a natural part of life it’s not something you can cure
naturethesupreme OP t1_ir87918 wrote
Check up Aubrey d greys, David sinclair and experiments on animals related to this topic, even about certain species of plants and animals that display countermeasures to ageing
Primus_Pilus1 t1_ir8o4nr wrote
Explain immortal animals then and why it would be unnatural to attempt to duplicate what some animals already do??
TrainingAfternoon860 t1_ir8r0ko wrote
because we are not those Animals anyway this does not even matter Ageing is not a disease and cannot be stopped
TheHamsterSandwich t1_ira1p7h wrote
"Ageing cannot be stopped"
It can be reset.
Please do your research before making stupid comments.
TrainingAfternoon860 t1_ira1sbn wrote
No it cannot be I have done plenty of research do some of your own
TheHamsterSandwich t1_iraa039 wrote
Show me what you've found.
Primus_Pilus1 t1_iracfq1 wrote
Actually it can be slowed. If it can be slowed via various methods, it can eventually be stopped.
Aging is is simply replication failures in cells across the body compounded until death.
TrainingAfternoon860 t1_irad2lr wrote
No it cannot be slowed or stopped this study from the university explained what I am talking about I can’t find the actual paper but here is the article
TheHamsterSandwich t1_iraztis wrote
Do you just believe everything you read?
"There is little science can currently do to stop or slow aging."
This has nothing to do with future advancements.
TrainingAfternoon860 t1_irb0mmz wrote
Perhaps actually read the full article instead of nit picking this clearly has a big effect on future advancements
TheHamsterSandwich t1_irb24j5 wrote
No, it doesn't. But I'll let you think that. I'm done with this.
TrainingAfternoon860 t1_irb2caw wrote
lol ok I respect your freedom of religion even if it is extremely stupid
Primus_Pilus1 t1_ircl3i8 wrote
Yes and scientists said we would never fly. Or that we would never fly faster than the speed of sound. Don't believe it when scientists say you cannot.
TheHamsterSandwich t1_ire41j6 wrote
"No! Suffering is natural! You can't have life without suffering. Just give up, scientists. You've got nothing on mother nature."
TrainingAfternoon860 t1_irg9uo7 wrote
People also said we would have flying cars by now and some AI experts in the 70s said they would build AGI in 12 months we should always be skeptical of optimistic claims be it someone claiming the future or saying something impossible both should be taken with a grain of salt but if they have genuine reasons then there’s No reason to completely reject something
TheHamsterSandwich t1_irr10pu wrote
It's sensible to skeptical of a futurist, but it doesn't make any sense to just outright deny what aging researchers think.
StarChild413 t1_is555q1 wrote
how's it not a problem because it's natural
TrainingAfternoon860 t1_iu761f0 wrote
How is it a problem?
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments