Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Rumianti6 t1_ir3r2o2 wrote

Reply to comment by Sashinii in Google AI introduces FILM, a novel neural network architecture that can be used to create high-quality slow motion videos from near-duplicate photos, achieves state-of-the-art frame interpolation results in large motion by Shelfrock77

You really think that filmmaker's are going to feel threatened from AI? Artists are one thing, we already have trouble making a living so we might get scared of anything.

But filmmakers? You have any idea what it takes for a quality movie to be made anything at all. AI can't even generate hands correctly for it to generate movies they would have to make it look like real life.

You have no idea how much AI can't make movies.

0

Sashinii t1_ir4unah wrote

You're in denial about AI and the fact you're trivializing AI art proves that; neo-luddites just keep moving the goalposts because they know that progress will continue happening.

6

Rumianti6 t1_ir5e7ju wrote

Bro, I'm not moving goalposts, I'm just showing reality. AI is far from viable and it will take a while if ever for it to be truly be viable. The bar for viable is much harder then you think. If AI makes like a completely accurate diagram of all the human organs and skeleton from scratch with no artifacts or mistakes then I'll be scared but I just can't see that happening. For movies the AI would have to know all real life physics so I doubt filmmakers would be worried.

I am also not a "neo-luddite" whatever that means, I welcome technology, I also know that stuff like art can't be replaced by AI because art is experience. There is also some theories that AI are stealing art. You like anime don't you. Only a human could have created Steins;Gate. An AI couldn't generate it because it would have to understand stuff qualitatively.

0

MarginCalled1 t1_ir3xb8w wrote

I give it to 2030, repeat after me: Converging exponential technologies.

1