Submitted by Not-Banksy t3_126a1dm in singularity
TruckNuts_But4YrBody t1_je9d4kd wrote
Reply to comment by Kafke in When people refer to “training” an AI, what does that actually mean? by Not-Banksy
EVERY color? No sorry
Kafke t1_je9drq3 wrote
Yes. You do realize our eyes only have three kinds of cones right? Rgb are the primary colors lol. Cmy if you're looking at subtractive colors. Using these three colors, you can create every other color. Rgb for light/additive, Cmy for ink/paint/subtractive.
Rby is not primary in any sense of the word.
TruckNuts_But4YrBody t1_je9e2ab wrote
Not every other color, no.
scooby1st t1_jeaehdn wrote
Kafke t1_jebepd5 wrote
Yeah that's just incorrect. Additive primaries are RGB. Subtractive primaries are CMY. You're free to deny the facts all you'd like, but this is just an objective scientific thing.
scooby1st t1_jebf65c wrote
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yu44JRTIxSQ
Stop denying science
Kafke t1_jedkbke wrote
Some childrens tv shows or media programs stating incorrect information does not make it correct. Additive primaries are RGB, subtractive primaries are CMY. The idea that RBY are primary colors is a popular misconception, but is incorrect. It has it's roots in art classes prior to proper scientific investigation of color, light, and modern technology. If your goal is art history, then yes, people in the past incorrectly believed that the primary colors (both additive and subtractive) were RBY. They were wrong. Just as people believed the earth was flat, yet were wrong.
scooby1st t1_jedm36o wrote
Have you considered the following?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yu44JRTIxSQ
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments