I'll take the words of engineers and the people who work with these models over the words of some pseud who appeals to wannabe intellectuals with his use of philsophical buzzwords

The reason why you't really argue against his points is because he presents scenarios that haven't been proven. Kind of reminds me of the alarmism of how the research over at cern could end the universe. A lot of things can happen, I remember a couple years back there was a lot of talk about how AI was going to replace blue collar jobs first and now it's opposite.

The future is unpredictable and there's no point in trying to prevent scenarios that haven't happened.

If you want a good expert in the more non-technical side you should start with David Deutsch who actually has good credentials.