Nanaki_TV t1_jegt7f8 wrote
Reply to comment by HarbingerDe in I have a potentially controversial statement: we already have an idea of what a misaligned ASI would look like. We’re living in it. by throwaway12131214121
I cannot make claims about the future I do not know. That’s the problem with having principles and building on them. If I propose to end slavery in 1800s you’re objection to “who would pick the cotton!?” is not a rebuttal. And if I did somehow have a crystal ball saying giant machines would do it—1,000:1 people will be out of labor it would be so efficient you’d call for UBI then too. New horizons will be created. What they will be I cannot even begin to guess.
HarbingerDe t1_jegwjgf wrote
>If I propose to end slavery in 1800s you’re objection to “who would pick the cotton!?” is not a rebuttal.
Typical right-wing / conservative move of, "uhh actually we're totally the ones who are against slavery... Yeah... It was us..."
The scenarios are not analogous at all.
>New horizons will be created. What they will be I cannot even begin to guess.
You are fundamentally at odds with the premise of the sub, this seems to be the biggest thing you're not grasping.
If you believe we're on the cusp of developing a self improving entity that is more intelligent, more creative, and all around more capable than a human at any given task then there cannot be any new horizons that an AI wouldn't better be able to take advantage of.
Nanaki_TV t1_jeh2wso wrote
Yes there can be. Simply greeting each other could be enough. Human created works could have value.
Oh and idk what straw-man that was you were building so I am ignoring it.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments