Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

freeThePokemon246 t1_jb5fb9l wrote

I foresee a dead end in LLMs. Their core limitations are plainly visible, if one takes of their hype glasses. Once the spark of hope that is the LLMs wink out of existence we shall once again be back in a hopeless AI darkness. Maybe the next generation after us will be luckier.

1

94746382926 t1_jb5xztj wrote

Man this sub can be something else sometimes. The thread is literally asking for what people think could slow things down and you get downvoted for stating your opinion lol. People need to lay off the hopium a little bit.

To be clear I don't even really agree with your opinion (I think LLM's could possibly see a slowing of improvement soon, but think they will be quickly replaced). Regardless, we should want dissenting opinions, especially when we're asking for them.

16

challengethegods t1_jb60zd1 wrote

>you get downvoted for stating your opinion lol.
>
>To be clear I don't even really agree with your opinion

yea that pretty much summarizes how reddit voting works.

10

94746382926 t1_jb61csk wrote

I mean I up voted him even though I disagreed, but yeah most people just downvote whatever they disagree with not necessarily what promotes discussion.

5

thatdudejtru t1_jb6d4xz wrote

Right? Is it not the job of a comment to...ya know...comment on the idea, whether you deem it wrong or right in the context. Upvoting and downvoting should be about filtering out lack of contributing content.

6

Frumpagumpus t1_jb6efow wrote

soon AI will be able to identify people that vote this way and eliminate them, er I mean, shadow vote ban them.

4

challengethegods t1_jb6szip wrote

"yea man, I totally agree with this. [downvotes it anyway]"
some kind of neurotoxin for AI training data, probably

3

SgathTriallair t1_jb7js51 wrote

Agreed. It's a stupid opinion but they did ask for what would possibly cause it to slow down and, of they were right, this would slow it down.

The down votes are probably for saying it's true rather than saying it's a method by which a show down could happen.

2

TopicRepulsive7936 t1_jb6v19g wrote

That guy doesn't know how much machine learning is used and neither do you.

0

94746382926 t1_jb6wtbj wrote

Did you miss the part where I said I didn't agree with him?

3

TopicRepulsive7936 t1_jb6yx3r wrote

You said you don't agree with his opinion. Lies aren't an opinion.

−1

94746382926 t1_jb6z0sg wrote

Can you see the future? Nobody knows for sure how far LLM's will take us. A prediction is not a lie even if it turns out to be false.

2

TopicRepulsive7936 t1_jb6z9ss wrote

And is LLM's the only thing we're doing?

−1

94746382926 t1_jb71arm wrote

No, and I never said that. It was his opinion that LLM's will stall out and we'll have another AI winter, not mine. I don't see the issue here.

I think we have plenty of other types of models that will find success, LLM's seem to only be one piece of the puzzle.

2

Zer0D0wn83 t1_jb5jm27 wrote

Yeah, the same thing happened with that internet thing that everyone was banging on about in the late 90s. I wonder what happened to that...

14

Cryptizard t1_jb5t74z wrote

The more direct comparison is when the perceptron was invented and everyone said it’s just a couple years of tuning it until we get AGI. That was in the 1960s.

7

challengethegods t1_jb60c3b wrote

That explains why politics has had an AI-Generated vibe for the last 50 years.

3

Neurogence t1_jb60puu wrote

To play devil's advocate, I think it would be extremely foolish to rely on LLM's to take us all the way.

7

Zer0D0wn83 t1_jb62bai wrote

Agreed. You never rely on one tech, same as the Internet hasn't

2

phillythompson t1_jb5jysg wrote

And what limitations do you see with LLMs that wouldn’t be “solved” as time goes on?

2

Silly_Awareness8207 t1_jb5knx0 wrote

I'm no expert but the hallucination problem seems pretty difficult

14

[deleted] t1_jb8niwt wrote

I don't see how any other architecture would solve that problem, that's just an issue of how current LLMs are trained

1

Caring_Cactus t1_jb5o5aq wrote

We are at narrow AI right now, this is only the beginning as AGI is being developed.

1